PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Andre Dubuche, appeals from his conviction for direct criminal contempt and from his revocation of probation. We reverse, in part, and affirm, in part.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred by entering a written order finding him in direct criminal contempt because the contempt arose from conduct that was not committed in the actual presence of the judge. See Gidden v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.