1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 730 So.2d
  5. 730 So.2d 1175 (1999)
 

EX PARTE RUSH

1980328.

730 So.2d 1175 (1999)

Ex parte Steve RUSH and Kim Rush. (In re Steve Rush v. Terminix International, Inc., et al.; and Kim Rush v. Terminix International, Inc., et al.).

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 26, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard W. Whittaker, Enterprise, for petitioners.

T. Julian Motes and Michael E. Gabel of Sirote & Permutt, P.C., Mobile; and William H. Filmore of Matthews & Filmore, Ozark, for respondents Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc., d/b/a Terminix Service; Terminix International, Inc.; Hal Stacey Worthington; and Michael E. Hobaugh.

HOUSTON, Justice.

Steve Rush and his wife Kim Rush petition for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its orders compelling them to arbitrate their fraud and wantonness claims against Allied-Bruce Terminix Companies, Inc., d/b/a Terminix Service ("Terminix Service"); Terminix International, Inc.; Hal Worthington; and Mike Hobaugh. The Rushes filed separate complaints; however, the trial court consolidated the two cases and ordered that all claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases