In this appeal of his convictions of escape and resisting an officer without violence, Carl D. Wagner raises numerous issues. We find merit only in his contention that this case must be remanded for entry of formal, written orders of revocation of probation in case nos. 95-4015, 96-3021, and 96-3022 because the memo of sentence is insufficient to serve as those orders. See Grantham v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WAGNER v. STATE
No. 98-04538.
744 So.2d 1155 (1999)
Carl D. WAGNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 29, 1999.
October 29, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
