KELLEY v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY

LUBA No. 97-139; CA A104016.

973 P.2d 916 (1999)

158 Or. App. 159

Larry KELLEY, Respondent, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 3, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Andrew Clark, Assistant County Counsel argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner. With him on the brief was Clackamas County Counsel.

Dover A. Norris-York, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were James H. Bean and Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, LLP.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and LINDER, Judges.


De MUNIZ, P.J.

Respondent Kelley applied to Clackamas County for a variance to permit a pool house at a location in his front yard that did not satisfy the applicable setback requirement of the county zoning ordinance.1 After the variance was denied by county planning personnel and by a county hearings officer, Kelley appealed to LUBA. It reversed the county's decision, and the county seeks our review. We reverse.

Section 1205...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases