1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 89 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 89 Cal.Rptr.2d 99 (1999)
 

KURTZ v. CALVO

No. D031301.

89 Cal.Rptr.2d 99 (1999)

75 Cal.App.4th 191

Samuel T. KURTZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Paul CALVO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

September 27, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen W. Misch, El Cajon, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Robert A. Lisnow, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.

McINTYRE, J.

Samuel T. Kurtz and Jerelyn Kurtz (collectively, Plaintiffs) sued Paul Calvo, Peggy Calvo, Howard Yonet, and Daniele Yonet (collectively, Defendants) to collect on a promissory note. They appeal a judgment in favor of Defendants after the first phase of a bifurcated trial in which the court determined the action is barred by the antideficiency rule of Code of Civil Procedure section 580b (section 580b). They contend (1) the antideficiency rule does not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases