SCOTT v. PA BD. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE


739 A.2d 1142 (1999)

Keith M. SCOTT, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided October 27, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard N. Sosnov, Philadelphia, for petitioner.

Arthur R. Thomas, Harrisburg, for respondent.

Before SMITH, J., PELLEGRINI, J., and RODGERS, Senior Judge.


PELLEGRINI, Judge.1

On remand from an order of the Supreme Court, Keith M. Scott (Scott) claims that his prior counsel was ineffective because he did not raise the issue that the search of his parents' home was illegal under Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

This claim had its origin when Scott was paroled from a ten-to-twenty year prison sentence. One of the conditions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases