PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and misdemeanor possession of cannabis. We affirm the conviction for possession of cannabis. We must, however, reverse the conviction for possession of cocaine because the State's evidence was not inconsistent with Appellant's reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See, e.g., Cook v. State,
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.