ARMSTRONG, J.
The defendant appeals from the order revoking probation on his suspended sentence. He argues that his constitutional right to due process was violated because he was denied the ability to confront and cross-examine witnesses against him.
On January 15, 1997, the defendant was convicted of violating an abuse prevention order, based on his admission to sufficient facts. A thirty-month sentence was imposed, fifteen months to be served, with the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
