HEAL v. GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.

No. 40939-5-I.

979 P.2d 864 (1999)

HONESTY IN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND LEGISLATION (HEAL); Jack Temple and Bess Temple, husband and wife; Betty Lock; Irene Kochendorfer; Sam Brace; Wayne Kemp; and A. Duane Munro, Respondents, v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, Defendant, City of Seattle, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

As Amended on Reconsideration in Part August 25, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Watters, Columbia River Gorge Commission, White Salmon, for Amicus Curiae.

Judith Barbour & Eleanore Baxendale, Seattle, for Appellant.

John M. Groen, Bellevue, Brent Boger, Vancouver, for Respondents.


APPELWICK, J.

In developing critical areas policies and regulations, a city or county must include in the record the best available science, as a factor to be considered along with all other factors mandated to be considered by the Growth Management Act, 36.70A RCW. Growth management hearings boards have jurisdiction to review a city or county's critical areas policies, but only for the limited purpose of reviewing whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases