EDWARDS v. SALEEN-DEGRANGE

(CV 94-343, CA A99185)

984 P.2d 854 (1999)

161 Or. App. 156

Kenneth L. EDWARDS, Sharon A. Edwards, Robert W. West and Gwendolyn F. West, Respondents, v. Jim L. SALEEN-DEGRANGE and Eula Saleen-Degrange, Appellants, and Jimmie L. Saleen-Degrange, Defendant, and Linda Saleen-Degrange, Riter H. Dean, Lenabelle Dean and Martha K. Storaci, Respondents. Riter H. Dean, Lenabelle Dean, Martha K. Storaci, and Linda Pachal, fka Linda Saleen-Degrange, Plaintiffs, v. Yamhill County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Third-Party Defendant. Jim L. Saleen-Degrange and Eula Saleen-Degrange, Plaintiffs, v. Yamhill County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Cross-Claim-Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 16, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl R. Neil, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler LLP.

John Bridges, Newberg, argued the cause for respondents Kenneth L. Edwards, Sharon A. Edwards, Robert W. West and Gwendolyn F. West. With him on the brief was Brown, Tarlow, Smith & Bridges, P.C.

Jerry B. Hart, McMinnville, argued the cause for respondent Linda Saleen-Degrange. With him on the brief was Craig, Brand, Lake & Hart.

Mark C. Hoyt, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents Riter H. Dean, Lenabelle Dean and Martha K. Storaci.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and BREWER, Judges.


BREWER, J.

This multi-party dispute concerns two boundary locations and access to adjoining properties on the outskirts of Dayton, in Yamhill County. Kenneth and Sharon Edwards and Robert and Gwendolyn West (plaintiffs) brought this action against defendants Jim and Eula Saleen-Degrange (Jim and Eula), Jimmie Saleen-Degrange (Jimmie) and Linda Pachel (Linda)1—the owners of the northerly adjoining properties—and defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases