IN RE D.T.

No. 99-052.

743 A.2d 1077 (1999)

In re D.T.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Motion for Reargument Denied November 22, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Rose, St. Albans, for Appellant-Mother.

Charles Martin of Martin & Associates, Barre, for Appellant-Father.

William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, Montpelier, and Howard W. Stalnaker, Assistant Attorney General, Waterbury, for Appellee SRS.

Daniel Albert, Public Defender, St. Albans, for Appellee Juvenile.

Present AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.


SKOGLUND, J.

Mother appeals from a family court decision that held D.T. is a child in need of care and supervision (CHINS). She claims that the family court did not have jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) over the merits of the CHINS proceeding. She further claims that the court's determination that D.T. was a child in need of care or supervision was unsupported by the court's findings and that the findings of the court have no support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases