MAAS v. CORNELL UNIV.


94 N.Y.2d 87 (1999)

721 N.E.2d 966

699 N.Y.S.2d 716

JAMES MAAS, Appellant, v. CORNELL UNIVERSITY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 23, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Stoll, New York City, Center for Individual Rights, Washington D.C. (Michael E. Rosman of counsel), and Lo Pinto, Schlather, Solomon & Salk, Ithaca, for appellant.

Nelson E. Roth, Ithaca, James J. Mingle, Patricia A. McClary and Wendy E. Tarlow for respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and ROSENBLATT concur; Judge WESLEY taking no part.


OPINION OF THE COURT

BELLACOSA, J.

The overriding issue on this appeal is whether plaintiff, Professor James Maas, may assert a plenary breach of contract action against defendant Cornell University, his employer. The lawsuit is premised on the University's alleged failure to follow the procedures it had promulgated and used for the resolution of sexual harassment claims brought by four students against their teacher...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases