HOLLIS v. GARWALL, INC.

No. 66254-1.

974 P.2d 836 (1999)

137 Wash.2d 683

Jim C. HOLLIS and Connie M. Hollis, husband and wife; Richard L. Mansor And Toni C. Mansor, husband and wife, Respondents, v. GARWALL, INC., a Washington Corporation; Stephen Garner and Jane Doe Garner, husband and wife; Charles Wallin and Jane Doe Wallin, husband and wife; Ibex Construction, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided April 15, 1999.

Reconsideration Denied June 2, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Winston & Cashatt, James Reed, Spokane, McGrane & Schuerman, David E. McGrane, Colville, for Petitioners.

David I. Davison, Winslow, for Respondents.


GUY, C.J.

This is an action to enforce a restrictive covenant set forth in a subdivision plat. We accepted review to resolve a conflict existing between the divisions of the Court of Appeals with respect to whether the "context rule" articulated in Berg v. Hudesman, 115 Wn.2d 657, 801 P.2d 222 (1990), applies to the interpretation of restrictive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases