LEE v. APPRAISER CERT. AND LICENS. BD.

(96-09-002; CA A99750)

981 P.2d 825 (1999)

160 Or. App. 622

Jeremy E. LEE, Petitioner, v. APPRAISER CERTIFICATION AND LICENSURE BOARD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 19, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. McGlone, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Wallace, Klor & Mann, P.C.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and BREWER, Judges.


BREWER, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a final order on reconsideration1 of the Appraiser Certification and Licensure Board in a contested case proceeding based on his unlicensed practice of real estate appraisal activity. ORS 674.100. The Board held petitioner in violation and imposed a total civil penalty of $8,600 for 18 separate violations. Petitioner contends that the Board erroneously interpreted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases