1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 986 P.2d
  5. 986 P.2d 688 (1999)
 

SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE v. RIDENOUR

(95-01135, 95-00795, 94-12518; CA A99664)

986 P.2d 688 (1999)

162 Or. App. 467

In the Matter of the Compensation of Debra L. Ridenour, Claimant. SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE and Aetna Casualty Co., Petitioners, v. Debra L. RIDENOUR, Klamath County Personnel and Saif Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Bolen, Medford, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Hornecker, Cowling, Hassen & Heysell.

Martha J. Rodman, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent Debra L. Ridenour. On the brief were Robert F. Webber and Black, Chapman, Webber & Stevens.

Julene M. Quinn argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents Klamath County Personnel and SAIF Corporation.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and WARDEN, Senior Judge.

LANDAU, P.J.

Sisters of Providence and its workers' compensation insurance carrier, Aetna Casualty Co. (Aetna), seek review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board (Board) finding Aetna responsible for claimant's current low back condition and need for treatment. The Board found that Aetna had failed to rebut the presumption that, when there have been successive injuries to the same body part, the last industrial injury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases