1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 999 S.W.2d
  5. 999 S.W.2d 669 (1999)
 

MARY KAY, INC. v. ISBELL

No. 98-489.

999 S.W.2d 669 (1999)

338 Ark. 556

MARY KAY, INC., a/k/a Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc., v. Janet ISBELL.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

September 23, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, by: Roger D. Rowe, Nancy Bellhouse May, and Troy A. Price, Little Rock, for appellant.

Stephens Law Firm, by: K. Gregory Stephens, Conway, and Windle Turley, P.C., Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

TOM GLAZE, Justice.

This case requires our interpretation of the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act, Ark.Code Ann. §§ 4-72-201 to -210 (Repl. 1996 and Supp.1997), and whether the Act applies to the business relationship established between appellee Janet Isbell and appellant Mary Kay, Inc. Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 1-2(b). This court's jurisdiction is also invoked because the case presents issues of first impression and of substantial public interest and issues involving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases