1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 742 A.2d
  5. 742 A.2d 898 (1999)
 

KEZER v. MARK STIMSON ASSOCIATES

742 A.2d 898 (1999)

1999 ME 184

Edward KEZER et al. v. MARK STIMSON ASSOCIATES et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided December 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Waxman (orally), Portland, for plaintiffs.

Kevin J. Beal (orally), Jonathan S. Piper, Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau, Pachios & Haley, LLC, for Mark Stimson Assoc. and others, defendants. Theodore H. Irwin Jr. (orally), Douglas, Denham Rogers & Hood, Portland, for Thomas and Beth Peaslee, defendants.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.

CALKINS, J.

[¶ 1] Edward and Donna Kezer appeal from the summary judgment (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) entered in favor of the defendants Mark Stimson Associates, Mark Stimson, Dawn Klein, Joyce Frost (the Stimson defendants), and Thomas and Beth Peaslee. On appeal, the Kezers contend that the trial court erred when it failed to recognize that they had generated a genuine issue of material fact. We affirm the judgment.

I. FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases