1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 738 A.2d
  5. 738 A.2d 898 (1999)
 

MD. RACING COMM. v. CLOVERLEAF

No. 1923, Sept. Term, 1998.

738 A.2d 898 (1999)

128 Md. App. 423

MARYLAND RACING COMMISSION, et al. v. CLOVERLEAF ENTERPRISES, INC.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Reconsideration Denied November 9, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce C. Spizler, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellant, Maryland Racing Com'n.

Linda Woolf (James E. Gray, David H. Hollander, Jr. and Goodell, DeVries, Leech & Gray, LLP, on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellants, Maryland Jockey Club and Laurel Racing Assoc., Inc.

John P. McDonough (Vernell B. Arrington and O'Malley, Miles, Nylen & Gilmore, P.A., on the brief), Calverton, for Appellee.

Argued before WENNER, THIEME and SONNER, JJ.

WENNER, Judge.

Appellee, Cloverleaf Enterprises, Inc., (CEI), filed a petition with the Maryland Racing Commission (MRC) requesting permission to simulcast out-of-state thoroughbred races and conduct pari-mutuel betting at Rosecroft Raceway on these out-of-state races. CEI conducts live harness racing at Rosecroft Raceway. The Maryland Jockey Club of Baltimore City, Inc. (MJC), and the Laurel Racing Association, Inc. (Laurel), owners of Laurel and Pimlico racetracks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases