VINCENC v. BAUMGARTNER

No. 74582.

988 S.W.2d 646 (1999)

Karen M. VINCENC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Daniel BAUMGARTNER, D.D.S., Defendant/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

April 6, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Callis, Papa, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C., John T. Papa, Granite City, IL, for appellant.

Wilke & Wilke, P.C., Daniel E. Wilke & Richard A. Tjepkema, Clayton, for respondent.

Before HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J. and RHODES RUSSELL, J.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karen Vincenc appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Daniel Baumgartner in a dental malpractice action. Vincenc claims the trial court erred in: (1) denying her request for a mistrial; (2) giving a comparative fault verdict director; (3) denying her motion in limine; and (4) allowing improper evidence, comment, and argument by Baumgartner.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases