1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 708 N.E.2d
  5. 708 N.E.2d 911 (1999)
 

THOMSEN v. MUSALL

No. 49A05-9812-CV-596.

708 N.E.2d 911 (1999)

D.J. THOMSEN and Thomsen Law Office, Appellants-Defendants, v. Kentin MUSALL and Edna Musall, Appellees-Plaintiffs.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

April 21, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd J. Kaiser, T. Joseph Wendt, Locke Reynolds Boyd & Weisell, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellant.

Kentin Musall, Edna Musall, Indianapolis, Indiana, Appellees Pro Se.

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

D.J. Thomsen and Thomsen Law Office (collectively, "Thomsen"), bring this interlocutory appeal from the denial of their summary judgment motion on Kentin and Edna Musall's claim for legal malpractice. The issues presented are:

I. Whether Thomsen was entitled to summary judgment based upon D.J. Thomsen's own affidavit that she did not breach the standard of care and that her representation of the Musalls did not proximately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases