MOODY v. HAYMARKET ASSOCIATES


723 A.2d 874 (1999)

1999 ME 17

Dan C. MOODY v. HAYMARKET ASSOCIATES, et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided January 28, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph M. Jabar, Daviau, Jabar & Batten, Waterville, ME, for plaintiff.

John B. Lucy, Frederick J. Badger, Jr., Richardson, Whitman, Large & Badger, Bangor, ME, for defendants.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, DANA, SAUFLEY, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.


WATHEN, C.J.

[¶ 1] Plaintiff Dan C. Moody appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Kravchuk, C.J.) after a jury verdict in favor of defendants Haymarket Associates and Sidney Epstein, on his negligence claim. Plaintiff argues that the court abused its discretion in allowing irrelevant and prejudicial evidence of the absence of other accidents. We agree and vacate.

[¶ 2] The facts may be summarized as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases