PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, appellant seeks review of his conviction, following a non-jury trial, for possession of cocaine with intent to sell. He argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal because the state based its case upon a theory of constructive possession, but failed to establish all of the essential elements. We agree. To establish constructive possession in a case such as this, the state is obliged...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
