MEYER v. HILL

No. 74614.

993 S.W.2d 586 (1999)

Fred E. MEYER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Janice HILL, Defendant/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 22, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pedroli & Gauthier, Robert H. Pedroli, Clayton, for appellant.

Boggs, Backer & Bates, L.L.C., Beth C. Boggs, Robert P. Sass, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., CRANDALL and AHRENS, J.J.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fred E. Meyer raises three points on appeal. Meyer claims that the trial court abused its discretion in: (1) denying Meyer's motion for mistrial when Hill's counsel commented that Meyer's gross salary was not detrimentally affected in the year of the accident; (2) denying Meyer's motion for mistrial following Hill's closing argument because statements that all of the medical bills had been paid was a violation of the Collateral Source...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases