1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 722 A.2d
  5. 722 A.2d 846 (1999)
 

MATURU v. DOES

No. 97-AA-446.

722 A.2d 846 (1999)

Ratna MATURU, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided January 7, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ratna Maturu, pro se, was on the brief for petitioner.

Sharman J. Monroe, Washington, DC, was on the brief for respondent.

Before STEADMAN and REID, Associate Judges, and BELSON, Senior Judge.

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

The issue in this appeal is the proper treatment of severance pay in determining the eligibility of a laid-off employee for unemployment benefits. The Department of Employment Services (DOES) apparently interpreted our decision in Dyer v. District of Columbia Unemployment Comp. Bd., 392 A.2d 1 (D.C.1978), to mandate that a severance payment must be treated as applicable to the time in which the payment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases