PER CURIAM
We find that the respondent, attorney Zena D. Crenshaw, is in contempt of this Court for failing to abide by investigative subpoenas issued to her by the Disciplinary Commission.
This case began on September 18, 1998. when the Commission filed its Verified Information and Motion for Order to Show Cause why Respondent Should not be Held in Contempt of Court. On January 8, 1999, the respondent filed her Verified Motion to Dismiss for Lack...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.