BINGHAM v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

(98-AB-0617; CA A101952)

987 P.2d 578 (1999)

163 Or. App. 381

Lowell F. BINGHAM, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Northern Automotive Corp., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 13, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Gentry, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Tooze Duden Creamer Frank & Hutchison.

Brian R. Talcott, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Northern Automotive Corp. With him on the brief were G. Kenneth Shiroishi and Dunn, Carney, Allen Higgins & Tongue.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent Employment Department.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


HASELTON, J.

Claimant seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment benefits. The Board concluded that claimant's refusal to provide his employer with a written statement regarding work-related conduct was misconduct. ORS 657.176(2)(a).1 Claimant challenges the findings underlying that determination as being unsupported by substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(8)(c),2 and further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases