1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 985 P.2d
  5. 985 P.2d 564 (1999)
 

BAHR v. STATE

No. 1 CA-CV 97-0580.

985 P.2d 564 (1999)

195 Ariz. 79

Sandy BAHR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Arizona, Defendant-Appellee, and Intel Corporation, Intervenor-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

As Amended January 20 and March 3, 1999.

Review Denied September 21, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest by Timothy M. Hogan and Jennifer B. Anderson, Phoenix, Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Grant Woods, The Attorney General by Michael F. Kempner, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee.

Brown & Bain, P.A. by Paul F. Eckstein, Lynne C. Adams and John J. Tuchi and Cruse, Firetag & Bock, P.C. by Jules I. Firetag, Phoenix, Attorneys for Intervenor-Appellee.

OPINION

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Sandy Bahr (Bahr), represented by the Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest, appeals from a summary judgment entered for appellees State of Arizona and intervenor Intel Corporation (Intel) in Bahr's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief. The trial court rejected Bahr's contention that a subdivision of the "class eight" property classification established by Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (A.R.S.) § 42-162...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases