1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 189 F.3d
  5. 189 F.3d 1355 (1999)
 

GOOD v. U.S.

No. 97-5138.

189 F.3d 1355 (1999)

Lloyd A. GOOD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 31, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard R. Nageotte, Nageotte, Nageotte & Nageotte, of Stafford, Virginia, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was John G. Roberts, Jr., Hogan & Hartson, of Washington, DC.

Ethan G. Shenkman, Attorney, Appellate Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Lois J. Schiffer, Assistant Attorney General, Robert L. Klarquist, and Dorothy R. Burakreis, Attorneys.

Glenn P. Sugameli, National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae The National Wildlife Federation. Of counsel on the brief was James B. Dougherty, Washington, DC.

James S. Burling, Pacific Legal Foundation, of Sacramento, California, for amicus curiae Pacific Legal Foundation. With him on the brief was Peter G. Gioia, Pacific Legal Foundation, Stuart, Florida.

John D. Echeverria, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Florida Audubon Society.

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

EDWARD S. SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is a regulatory takings case. Lloyd A. Good, Jr. sued the federal government on the basis that it effectively took his property without just compensation when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers denied him permission to dredge and fill on land he owns in the Florida Keys. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims granted summary judgment to the United States. Lloyd A. Good, Jr. v. United States, 39 Fed. Cl. 81 (1997). We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases