1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 734 A.2d
  5. 734 A.2d 808 (1999)
 

APFEL v. BUDD LARNER GROSS ROSENBAUM GREENBERG & SADE

734 A.2d 808 (1999)

324 N.J. Super. 133

Kenneth S. APFEL and Dennis M. Reznick, Plaintiffs, and Robert Novack, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BUDD LARNER GROSS ROSENBAUM GREENBERG & SADE, a Professional Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 27, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence B. Orloff, Mendham, for defendant-appellant (Orloff, Lowenbach, Stifelman & Siegel, attorneys; Mr. Orloff, of counsel; Mr. Orloff and Craig A. Ollenschleger, Roseland, on the brief).

Robert Novack, plaintiff-respondent, pro se.

Before Judges HAVEY, PAUL G. LEVY and LESEMANN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LESEMANN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

The law firm of Budd Larner Gross Rosenbaum Greenberg & Sade (Budd Larner) appeals from a summary judgment invalidating a provision in its Shareholders Agreement which denied certain termination benefits to plaintiff Robert Novack, who was leaving defendant with the intention of practicing law with another firm in this State. In granting summary judgment, the Law Division concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases