RICE v. LITSTER

No. 24667.

980 P.2d 561 (1999)

132 Idaho 897

Roy RICE, individually, and Roy Rice, d/b/a Vista Pawn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William J. LITSTER, Law Offices of William J. Litster, P.A., and Does I through VI, unknown parties, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, February 1999 Term.

May 25, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sallaz Law Offices, Chtd., Boise, for appellants. Thomas R. Henry argued.

Strother Law Offices, Boise, for respondents. Jeffrey A. Strother argued.


SCHROEDER, Justice.

This appeal arises from a legal malpractice action brought by Roy Rice (Rice) against the Law Offices of William J. Litster, P.A. (Litster). The district court dismissed Rice's malpractice claim on summary judgment after ruling that his claim was time barred pursuant to section 5-219(4) of the Idaho Code (I.C.). The Court affirms the decision of the district court.

I.

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Rice hired Litster...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases