1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 183 F.3d
  5. 183 F.3d 1342 (1999)
 

RHINE v. CASIO, INC.

No. 98-1432.

183 F.3d 1342 (1999)

Gary E. RHINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CASIO, INCORPORATED and Casio Computer Co., Ltd., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 6, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark C. Schaffer, Emch, Schaffer, Schaub & Porcello Co., L.P.A., Toledo, Ohio, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was James F. Porcello, Jr..

Barry D. Rein, Pennie & Edmonds, LLP, New York, New York, argued, for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Kenneth L. Stein.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

MAYER, Chief Judge.

Gary E. Rhine appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Case No. 96CV7524, which granted Casio, Inc. and Casio Computer Co., Ltd. (collectively "Casio") summary judgment of noninfringement. Because the court improperly construed the claim, we reverse the judgment and remand the case.

Background

Rhine owns U.S. Patent No. 4,910...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases