1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 724 A.2d
  5. 724 A.2d 798 (1999)
 

NASH v. LERNER

724 A.2d 798 (1999)

157 N.J. 535

Amelia NASH and Fred Nash, her husband, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Bella LERNER, Defendant-Appellant, and John Does, Township of Edison, and Richard Roes, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 17, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Peter Connell, Manasquan, for defendant-appellant (Connell & Connell, attorneys; Mr. Connell and Ronald S. Yuro, on the briefs).

Michael A. Cohan, Parlin, for plaintiffs-respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Rodriguez, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 193, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).

Justice POLLOCK has filed a separate dissenting opinion.

POLLOCK, J., dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases