1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 991 S.W.2d
  5. 991 S.W.2d 512 (1999)
 

UMAR v. SCOTT

No. 2-98-203-CV.

991 S.W.2d 512 (1999)

Kaazim Abul UMAR a/k/a W.L. Pittman, Appellant, v. Wayne SCOTT, David Skelton, Ken Bush, Leslie Woods, William Stephens, Jerry Groom, Stephanie Hanson, Jeffery Smith, Robert Eason, and Joe Sneed, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Publication Ordered June 10, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kaazim Abul Umar, a/k/a/ W.L. Pittman, Iowa Park, for appellant.

Dan Morales, Atty. Gen., Jorge Vega, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Drew T. Durham, Deputy Atty. Gen., Ann Kraatz, Charles K. Eldred, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, for appellee.

PANEL A: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and BRIGHAM, JJ.

OPINION

WILLIAM BRIGHAM, Justice.

Appellant, an inmate at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, "TDCJ-ID," complains of error in the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees, denying Appellant relief in his suit alleging that certain policies of TDCJ-ID violate his free exercise and equal protection rights. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Appellant's original pro se complaint1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases