1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 736 So.2d
  5. 736 So.2d 761 (1999)
 

HOENSTINE v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CAS. CO.

No. 99-6.

736 So.2d 761 (1999)

James HOENSTINE and Kathi Hoenstine, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, etc., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 2, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randy E. Schimmelpfennig of Billings, Cunningham, Morgan & Boatwright, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.

Andrew P. Rock and Heath B. Nailos of Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McLain, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PETERSON, J.

The appellants and their insurance company were not able to agree on the values of property damaged by a tornado and the appellants filed an action for breach of the contract of insurance.

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company filed a motion to abate based upon an appraisal clause in the policy:

6. APPRAISAL. If you and we fail to agree on the amount of loss, either one can demand that the amount of the loss be set by appraisal. If either...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases