SCOTTSDALE INS. v. PINECREST LTD.

No. 99-1018.

739 So.2d 733 (1999)

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PINECREST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida Limited Partnership; d/b/a Pinecrest Convalescent Home and Barton D. Weisman, a general partner, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 13, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wiederhold, Moses, Bulfin & Rubin and Robert D. Moses, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

McGrane & Nosich and Rhea P. Grossman, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment as the trial court properly enforced the insurance policy in accordance with its plain language and entered judgment concerning the attorney's fee issue in favor of appellees. See Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So.2d 339 (Fla.1990); Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So.2d 52 (Fla.1987); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases