1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 992 P.2d
  5. 992 P.2d 479 (1999)
 

PROTECTION MUTUAL v. MITSUBISHI SILICON

(96C13332; CA A98943)

992 P.2d 479 (1999)

164 Or. App. 385

PROTECTION MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., an Illinois corporation, Appellant, v. MITSUBISHI SILICON AMERICA CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Franklin Hunsaker, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Douglas G. Houser and Bullivant Houser Bailey.

James T. McDermott, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Ball Janik LLP.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and LINDER, Judges.

LINDER, J.

This case arises out of an insurance coverage dispute between plaintiff Protection Mutual Insurance Company (Protection Mutual) and defendant, Mitsubishi Silicon America Corporation (known as and referred to in this opinion as "Siltec"). The specific issue is whether Siltec's general property casualty policy, issued by Protection Mutual, covers certain "business interruption" losses that Siltec incurred when it lost useable water and water discharge services...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases