IN RE WELFARE OF J.A.D.

No. C2-99-868.

603 N.W.2d 844 (1999)

In the Matter of the WELFARE OF J.A.D., Child.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 21, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Charlann Winking, Assistant State Public Defender, Mark Elliot, Certified Student Attorney, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul; and Roger S. Van Heel, Stearns County Attorney, Janis L. Hovda, Assistant County Attorney, St. Cloud, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge, AMUNDSON, Judge, and HOLTAN, Judge.


OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge

Appellant challenges the district court's restitution order, arguing that a child victim's parent is not entitled to restitution for expenses incurred on the child's behalf. We affirm.

FACTS

In the fall of 1998, appellant J.A.D., a twelve-year old, pulled down his pants and exposed his penis to two children, a five-year-old male and a three-year-old female. J.A.D. was charged with two counts of indecent exposure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases