ANAEME v. DIAGNOSTEK, INC.

No. 97-2102.

164 F.3d 1275 (1999)

Chibu C. ANAEME, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIAGNOSTEK, INC.; Health Care Services; and HPI, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

January 6, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan G. Chappell, Paul Livingston with her on briefs, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Gregory L. Wilmes of Wilmes & Associates, Minneapolis, MN, Julie Savoie Wingert, General Counsel, MedManagement, LLC, Plymouth, MN, with him on brief for Defendants-Appellees.

Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.


McKAY, Circuit Judge.

In June 1995, Plaintiff Chibu Anaeme brought an action against Defendants Diagnostek, Inc., Health Care Services, and HPI in which he claimed disparate treatment and disparate impact under Title VII and racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. This case stems from Plaintiff's alleged submission to Defendants of approximately sixty employment applications for a staff pharmacist position between 1991 and 1994. Plaintiff received his Bachelor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases