1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 992 P.2d
  5. 992 P.2d 445 (1999)
 

BOLLINGER v. BOARD OF PAROLE

No. S43633. (CA A83561; SC S43633)

992 P.2d 445 (1999)

329 Or. 505

Edward Charles BOLLINGER, Respondent on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 9, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With her on the brief on the merits were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General. With her on the reply brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, and DURHAM, Justices.

GILLETTE, J.

This case arises out of a challenge to an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the Board) that advanced an inmate's scheduled parole release date. The order effectively prevented the inmate's discharge from prison under the statutory "good-time" scheme. The inmate objected to the order and sought judicial review. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the order violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases