1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 739 So.2d
  5. 739 So.2d 697 (1999)
 

MURPHY v. CHITTY

No. 99-295.

739 So.2d 697 (1999)

Leslie MURPHY and Arthur B. Person, Appellants, v. Robert CHITTY, etc., et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 3, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Potter of Holland & Knight — Potter, McClelland & Healy, Melbourne, for Appellants.

Patrick F. Roche and Christina B. Sutch of Frese, Nash & Torpy, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellees.

GOSHORN, J.

The circuit court entered a temporary injunction barring Appellants Murphy and Person from violating their non-compete agreements with appellees Robert Chitty and Chitty & Company (collectively "Chitty"). Appellants argue that the court erred in determining that the non-compete agreements were independent of certain other agreements between the parties which Chitty allegedly breached prior to Appellants'...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases