1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 996 S.W.2d
  5. 996 S.W.2d 414 (1999)
 

MIDKIFF v. HANCOCK EAST TEXAS SANITATION, INC.

No. 09-97-351 CV.

996 S.W.2d 414 (1999)

Hurshell MIDKIFF, Appellant, v. HANCOCK EAST TEXAS SANITATION, INC. and Dolgencorp of Texas, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Decided July 29, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Ronald Tucker, Ronald C. Muller, Tucker & Muller, Houston, for appellant.

Blair A. Bisbey, Seale, Stover, Coffield & Bisbey, Jasper, Victor L. Harris, Charles W. Seymore, Seymore & Harris, PLLC, Sugar Land, for appellees.

Before WALKER, C.J., BURGESS and STOVER, JJ.

OPINION

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from summary judgment. The state of the record before us requires that we examine the finality of the instrument entitled, "Final Summary Judgment," in light of the holding in Mafrige v. Ross, 866 S.W.2d 590 (Tex.1993), and its progeny. Hurshell Midkiff sued two separate defendants. Hancock East Texas Sanitation,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases