HEVEAFIL SDN. BHD., Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd., Rubfil Sdn. Bhd., and Filati Lastex Elastofibre (Malaysia) Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 23, 1999.
July 23, 1999.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
White & Case LLP, (Walter J. Spak, David E. Bond, Richard G. King, and Edward Meyers), for plaintiffs Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd., Rubfil Sdn. Bhd., and Filati Lastex Elastofibre (Malaysia).
David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice; Lucius B. Lau, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice; Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce (Mildred E. Steward, of counsel), for defendant.
United States Court of International Trade.
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Judge.
In this action, the Court reviews plaintiffs'1 challenges to the Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") final determination for the third administrative review of an antidumping duty order covering extruded rubber thread from Malaysia. Extruded Rubber Thread From Malaysia; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 62 Fed.Reg. 33,588 (June 20, 1997) ("Final Results")...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
