1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 604 N.W.2d
  5. 604 N.W.2d 799 (1999)
 

STATE v. UBER

No. C7-99-896.

604 N.W.2d 799 (1999)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Stephen Drew UBER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 28, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN (for respondent).

Michael J. Budka, Blaine City Attorney, St. Paul, MN (for respondent).

Thomas A. Rothstein, Minneapolis, MN (for appellant).

Considered and decided by LANSING, Presiding Judge, SHUMAKER, Judge, and HALBROOKS, Judge.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Following the denial of suppression motions, the district court found Stephen Uber guilty of aggravated DWI and violating a restricted driver's license. Uber challenges both the constitutionality of the traffic stop and the conviction under the aggravated-DWI statute, Minn.Stat. § 169.129 (1998). We affirm the constitutionality of the traffic stop, but we conclude that the aggravated-DWI statute does not apply to restricted licenses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases