SAIF v. COBURN

(WCB No. 96-10496; CA A99711)

977 P.2d 412 (1999)

159 Or. App. 413

In the Matter of the Compensation of Robert W. Coburn, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and G.I. Joes, Inc., Petitioners—Cross-Respondents, v. Robert W. COBURN, Respondent— Cross-Petitioner, and Department Of Consumer and Business Services, Respondent—Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 31, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Runner, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners—cross-respondents.

Robert Pardington, Portland, argued the cause for respondent—cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi Wilson Atchison LLP.

No appearance for respondent—cross-respondent.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and LINDER, Judges.


LINDER, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board (Board) reversing an order of the administrative law judge (ALJ) and holding that, after claim closure and claimant's subsequent completion of an authorized training program (ATP), employer was not entitled to redetermine the extent of claimant's unscheduled permanent disability because the original award had become final. We agree with employer that the Board erred in holding that there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases