TUCK v. GODFREY

No. 981118-CA.

981 P.2d 407 (1999)

1999 UT App 127

Mary M. TUCK, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. S. Chad GODFREY, an individual; and The Beehive House, a Utah limited partnership, Defendants and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

April 22, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kim R. Wilson, David L. Pinkston, and Paxton R. Guymon, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Ronny L. Cutshall and Vincent C. Rampton, Salt Lake City, for appellee.

Before: WILKINS, P.J., and BENCH and BILLINGS, JJ.


OPINION

BILLINGS, J.

¶ 1 Appellant S. Chad Godfrey appeals the trial court's entry of a default judgment against him for failure to comply with discovery requirements. We affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2 This case originated as a dispute over whether defendants S. Chad Godfrey (Godfrey) and Beehive House (Beehive) were required to repay funds given them by plaintiff Mary Tuck (Tuck).1 Beehive is owned by B. Ralph...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases