1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 589 N.W.2d
  5. 589 N.W.2d 793 (1999)
 

STATE v. WICKLUND

No. C7-97-1381.

589 N.W.2d 793 (1999)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Freeman Algot WICKLUND, et al., petitioners, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 11, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry B. Leventhal, Larry Leventhal & Associates, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Sandra Henkels Johnson, Assoc. Bloomington City Attorney, Bloomington, Mike Hatch, Attorney General State of Minnesota, St. Paul, for respondent.

Randall D.B. Tigue, John M. Sheran, Leonard, Street & Deinard, P.A., amicus curiae, Minneapolis.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

We granted review to consider whether an anti-fur protest staged in the common area adjacent to Macy's Department Store inside the Mall of America (MOA) is constitutionally protected speech. We agree with the court of appeals that it is not, and therefore affirm.

The essential facts are not in dispute. Just before noon on Sunday, May 19, 1996, appellants Freeman Algot Wicklund...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases