PER CURIAM.
There is no basis for the trial court's finding that appellee pled comparative negligence, and no competent substantial evidence supports the court's findings that appellant knew or should have known appellee was impaired or that appellee was impaired. Accordingly, the trial court erred in determining that appellant was comparatively negligent and in reducing appellant's damage award. We reverse.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
