MONROE v. HARMON

950463C; CA A93046.

973 P.2d 392 (1999)

158 Or. App. 196

William C. MONROE, Respondent, v. John HARMON, dba John's Transmission, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 3, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Harmon, Grants Pass, filed the brief pro se for appellant.

Frank C. Rote, III, and Brown, Hughes, Bird, Lane & Rote, Grants Pass, filed the briefs for respondent.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and LINDER, Judges.


HASELTON, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment that dismissed his appeal from an arbitration award and denied his request for a trial de novo. We conclude that the district court erred by entering judgment against defendant as a sanction for his failure to participate in mandatory court-annexed arbitration. The court lacked authority to sanction defendant by dismissing his appeal and denying his request for trial de novo, because defendant had an absolute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases