1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 97 F.Supp.2d
  5. 97 F.Supp.2d 1266 (1999)
 

MINERAL RESOURCE TECH. v. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTH.

No. 99-CV-501-H.

97 F.Supp.2d 1266 (1999)

MINERAL RESOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, Mineral Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY, a government agency of the State of Oklahoma, body politic and corporate, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma.

November 18, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burck Bailey John Barnes Heatly, Sanford C. Coats, Fellers Snider Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, Oklahoma City, OK, David J. Eiseman, Golenbock Eiseman Assor & Bell, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Mary Elizabeth Von Drehle, Allen B. Pease, Grand River Dam Authority, Vinita, OK, for Defendant.

Brian Stanley Gaskill, James Clay Lang, Patrick O. Waddel, Sneed Lang PC, Tulsa, OK, for Intervenor Plaintiff.

ORDER

HOLMES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the complaint by Plaintiff Mineral Resource Technologies, L.L.C. ("MRT") for declaratory judgment (Docket # 1). MRT seeks a declaration by this Court that a contract extension that MRT purportedly entered into with Defendant Grand River Dam Authority ("GRDA") is valid and that the contract extension did not have to be competitively bid. MRT requested expedited consideration of its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases