1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 176 F.3d
  5. 176 F.3d 1179 (1999)
 

U.S. v. RAMIREZ

Nos. 98-50289, 98-50295.

176 F.3d 1179 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alvaro Daniel RAMIREZ, and Arthur Emmith Smith, Jr., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed May 14, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherine Kimball, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for defendant-appellant Ramirez.

Charles E. Duff, Jr., Vista, California, for defendant-appellant Smith.

Julie F. Puleo, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: KOZINSKI and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and LOVELL, District Judge.

LOVELL, District Judge:

Alvaro Daniel Ramirez and Arthur Emmith Smith, Jr., appeal their jury convictions for conspiracy to import marijuana (21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 and 963), importation of marijuana (21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960), and possession with intent to distribute marijuana (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)), and aiding and abetting (18 U.S.C. § 2). Appellant Ramirez contends that the district court erred by admitting prejudicial Rule 404(b)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases